Header Ads

Updated: "Visual Guide to Marvel Character Movie Rights" Infographic by The Geek Twins [Infographic]


Find out which movie studio owns which Marvel comic book character movie rights in this simple graphic.

Why isn't wasn't Spider-Man in the Avengers (Updated since Sony has agreed to allow Spider-Man in Marvel Studios films)? Will there be a crossover between the Fantastic Four and the X-Men? This has since been hotly debated, but it raises the question. Why aren't all Marvel superheroes in the same movie?

In the 1990s, Marvel Comics started selling the movie rights for their characters to different studios. Because of those rights, only certain studios can use different Marvel comic book characters in films. When Marvel created their own studio, they began reacquiring these rights and created the first shared Marvel universe of film. This graphic answers the question of which studio owns which Marvel character movie rights. Each studio is in its own bubble and the characters cannot cross over. Except for Stan Lee. He's awesome and can go anywhere. 

Who owns the movie rights for the Fantastic Four? Who owns the rights to Spider-Man? Will Spider-Man join the Avengers? Can Namor fight Thor? Will Daredevil fight vampires?

As a side note, unless otherwise indicated, all character movie rights are based on the ownership of the main character. So, for example, 20th Century Fox owns the rights to any comic book characters that are mutants (ex. X-Men) while Marvel owns the rights to any comic book characters that are vampires (ex. Blade).

Version 4 - 2/21/2017

Updated by request with additional characters. Shout-out to Reddit's /MarvelStudios!


Version 3 - 2/11/2015


Version 2.

(Size 1200x960)

Version 1


(Size: 4444x3556px)
(Size: 1111x889)


All characters associated with the main character are the property of the studio. Any characters not listed are the property of Marvel Studios. Note: It would be hard to make a definitive list of every Marvel character in a single blog post, so this is just a small selection.
 

20th Century Fox
  • Doctor Doom
  • Human Torch (Johnny Storm)
  • Invisible Woman
  • Mr. Fantastic
  • The Thing
  • Alicia Masters
  • Willie Lumpkin
  • Puppet Master
  • Silver Surver
  • Nova (Frankie Raye)
  • Galactus
  • Cable
  • Scarlet Witch
  • Quicksilver
  • Deadpool
  • Agent Zero
  • Angel
  • Angel Salvadore
  • Arclight
  • Azazel
  • Banshee
  • Beast
  • Bishop
  • Callisto
  • Colossus
  • Cyclops
  • Darwin
  • Deadpool
  • Deathstrike
  • Emma Frost
  • Erik Lehnsherr
  • Gambit
  • Harada
  • Havok
  • Iceman
  • Jason Stryker
  • Jean Grey
  • John Wraith
  • Jubilee
  • Juggernaut
  • Katherine Pryde
  • Kenuichio Harada
  • Kid Omega
  • Lady Deathstrike
  • Landry Jones Cassidy
  • Leech
  • Lord Shingen
  • Lucas Bishop
  • Magneto
  • Mariko Yashida
  • Moira MacTaggert
  • Multiple Man
  • Mystique
  • Nightcrawler
  • Norubo Mori
  • Phoenix
  • Professor X
  • Psylocke
  • Pyro
  • Quill
  • Riptide
  • Rogue
  • Sabretooth
  • Sebastian Shaw
  • Shingen Yashida
  • Silverfox
  • Storm
  • The Blob
  • Toad
  • Viper
  • Wolverine
  • Yashida
  • Yukio
Sony Pictures
  • Spider-Man
  • Doctor Octopus
  • Green Goblin
  • Harry Osborn
  • The Lizard
  • Sandman
  • Venom
  • Betty Brant
  • Dennis Carradine (Buglar)
  • J. Jonah Jameson
  • Ben Parker
  • May Parker
  • John Jameson
  • Joseph “Robbie” Robertson
  • Mary Jane Watson
  • Gwen Stacy
  • Mendel Stromm
  • Flash Thompson
  • Black Cat
  • Rhino
  • Elektro

Universal Pictures
  • Hulk
Update: Updated based on Kevin Feige's comment about Namor and added Guardians of the Galaxy
Update 2: Updated with Man-Thing and Spider-Man
What do you think of the infographic? What Marvel movie team-up would you like to see? Which studio makes the best Marvel movies?

References
Check out some of our other infographics!

Please use the buttons below to tell your friends about this post. Click on the links to follow us for free by Email, RSS and follow us on Twitter @thegeektwins and like us on Facebook


39 comments:

  1. So the X-Men will not be fighting vampires?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would have liked Marvel to get Spider-Man back instead of him being stuck in his own little bubble there. It'd be cool if they could loan Wolverine for one of the Avengers movies, but I doubt that will happen.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've never heard of Man-thing, but I'm intrigued.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is why DC can have an advantage with their characters.
    I still want a proper Deadpool Movie. If you can make Kick A** a "R" rated comic movie you can do the same with Wade Wilson.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nisse SöderströmFebruary 7, 2014 at 2:49 AM

    amazing graphic!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Is Universal just being weird about Namor? Or is Marvel thinking there is no way Universal is going to try to make a movie with Namor and will wait for the rights to revert back on their own without negotiating?


    Anyway, the X-verse always seemed like a different thing to me anyway than the rest of Marvel, so it doesn't really bother me that Fox as them, and I wonder if we'd get the same number of movies coming out if Disney had Spider-Man, X-men, FF and the rest. I mean, we'd have to be getting 5 or 6 movies a year instead of the two we're getting now. Disney would have to be putting up a $Billion per year in production costs on Marvel properties alone. That's a lot of cash tied up in things that aren't Star Wars, or Pixar, or whatever other Disney flicks they have planned (like another Lone Ranger movie, perhaps).


    I'm curious how they'd handle it. So, like I said before, I'm kind of okay with Sony having Spider Man and

    ReplyDelete
  7. ... I don't think I finished my though. oops. But point made I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  8. That's a weird one alright. I think Marvel is just going to wait them out because ain't nobody screaming for a Sub-Mariner movie.

    ReplyDelete
  9. DidntPullOutInTimeCopFebruary 10, 2014 at 6:10 AM

    Love it, nice work! Wish Marvel could use Beast the same way as those upcoming twins. He's been quite a bit in Avengers right?



    I think the two Thor movies made more than the Fantastic Four movies even domestically?

    ReplyDelete
  10. You are missing quite a bit here. Fox has the rights to any characters directly associated with the fantastic four, such as the Skrull alien race. This is the reason in Avengers the alien army was the Chitauri, which are an alternate version of Skrulls.

    It hasn't come up yet, but they may also have the rights to She-Hulk, as she has been an active and reserve member of F4. Fox also holds the rights to the term MUTANT for marvel property films, so Avengers is going to have to make something new up to cover for Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch. There are a ton of little corner cases like these through out the 'film rights' that the multiple companies have divvied out.

    ReplyDelete
  11. How does Fox own the rights to Nova?? The Nova Corp. are going to be in the Guardians of the Galaxy movie.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Right you are Ninjin! I updated the list. Thanks for the correction!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks for the props DidntPullOutInTimeCop! Beast would be great in the Avengers, but I'm happy with what he's doing in "First Class." Great question! "Thor" and "Thor 2" made $379,683,600 combined while the Fantastic Four movies made $536,877,800. I'm sure as time goes on Thor will catch up and pass it, but who knows what the FF reboot will bring?

    ReplyDelete
  14. DidntPullOutInTimeCopFebruary 11, 2014 at 1:01 PM

    Oh that's a 5? Looked like a 3 on my screen, that's why :) Sorry about that!

    Yea it's not like they need more characters for Avengers anyway, we're lucky we're getting all these Marvel Movies!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I know one thing, if this isn't resolved no Infinity Gauntlet :(

    ReplyDelete
  16. Marvel has rights to the Nova Corp.

    Fox probably has rights to the character named "Nova" (Frankie Raye) who was a herald of Galactus and the Human Torch's girlfriend.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Pretty sure Sony has the rights to Vulture as well; he's hinted at in the Amazing Spidey 2 trailer and likely a part of the upcoming Sinister Six movie. You could probably list Mary Jane Watson too ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Franklin Richards (omega level MUTANT) should prove to be an epic fight between FOX & Marvel.



    ** Marvel : PowerPack
    ** FOX : Mom, Dad, Uncles Johnny & Ben, Rachel, H.E.R.B.I.E., etc


    The end result can be a (tear in reality) for both studios.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yeah, there are a lot of blurry versions of this graphic out there. :/ I think we're living in a golden age of superhero films.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Silver Surver, huh? "Excuse me master, would you like more silver?"

    ReplyDelete
  21. Nicely done.

    (Now we need one for video game licensing.)

    ReplyDelete
  22. Wow. That's a great point.  Can't have one without the other.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hey now. I'm screaming for a Subby movie (done right), and I'm not alone. Though, I suspect Marvel sold the rights to Namor to Universal a loooooong time ago, along with Hulk and Dr. Strange. Since Marvel's got the rights back on those, I'm not sure why they don't have Namor's rights back.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Also meant to say, GREAT infographic!

    ReplyDelete
  25. So who owns the Punisher? He's had like 3 movies.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Charlie, Punisher was Lionsgate but he's now back at Marvel!

    -------- Original message --------

    ReplyDelete
  27. So we might get a proper Punisher flick? I'm OK with that.

    ReplyDelete
  28. If Lionsgate Entertainment sill holds the rights to Man-Thing after all
    this time, then why was Marvel Studios able to include Ellen Brandt, the
    wife of Man-Thing, as a character in Iron Man 3?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Don't be. It's even worse than Howard the Duck. It was so bad that instead of going to movie theaters, it went to the Sci-Fi Channel.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Maybe Marvel Studios is working on getting the rights back? Not that they should bother; Swamp Thing bombed horribly, I don't see a Man-Thing movie doing any better.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Howard the Duck was, as they say on TV Tropes.org, so bad it was good.


    They actually did a Man-Thing movie? Even after Swamp Thing (essentially the same character) made Catwoman look like Iron Man 1, 2 and 3?

    ReplyDelete
  32. That is a great question Wyldstar. They were both introduced in "Savage Tales #1."

    ReplyDelete
  33. Lionsgate already made a Man-Thing movie in 2005. It was called Man-Thing, but it's basically just a monster movie that had nothing much to do with the comics. A few foreign theaters showed the flick. The film went straight to the Sci-Fi Channel in the US, then to DVD.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Elektra movie rights are still retained by Fox after the 2012-2013 negotiations that broke down with Marvel Studios.
    Cable is also up in the air, as back in 2009 Marvel Studios was considering him for a standalone movie that never moved forward. Then Liefeld mentioned in 2013 Cable is supposed to appear in the 'X-Force' movie. So TBD.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Great points Bob. Kevin Feige says he "thinks" the rights to Elektra are with Daredevil, so that would put them back with Marvel. So no one is sure. I'm going with Feige on that one, but he could be wrong.
    http://splashpage.mtv.com/2013/05/09/elektra-rights-returned-to-marvel/

    Cable is a pretty vague one since he's technically a mutant. Graser said he belongs to Marvel, but he may end up in the middle ground between Marvel and 20th Century Fox similar to Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch. I'm not sure where to put him because neither company has green lit a movie. Where do you think I should put him?
    http://www.newsarama.com/19897-who-goes-where-surveying-the-complicated-movie-rights-situation-of-marvel-comics.html

    ReplyDelete
  36. After the Fox-Marvel Studios negotiations broke down, and both parties missed out (Fox wanted to keep Daredevil, Marvel wanted Silver Surfer and Galactus back most probably to tie in with Guardians and Avengers 2), the spite action on the part of Fox was to claim continued movie rights on Elektra. I'm sure both parties went their separate ways with hard feelings.
    http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/dcmarvelrelatedfilms/news/?a=65739

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting!.