Header Ads

test

Star Wars Technology vs Star Trek Technology [Infographic]

This month, we're running our Geek Madness tournament, pitting Star Wars vs. Star Trek in terms of characters. But another long-running debate is in technology. Can a lightsaber beat a blaster? Can the Death Star take out a Borg cube? This infographic tries to answer the question.
Star Wars vs. Star Trek
Source: Best Online Engineering Degree

Who do you think is the winner?

[Via cnet.com via geeksaresexy.net]

Please use the buttons below to tell your friends about this post. Click on the links to follow us for free by Email, RSS and follow us on Twitter @thegeektwins

    Fandango - We've Got Your Movie Tickets!
Related Posts

12 comments:

  1. I'm gravitating towards Star Wars technology after reading all this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'd still feel safer with a phaser in my hand than a light saber. Less likely to accidentally remove my own limb.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I must confess...I love both, but Star Wars is my favourite.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I had predicted Luke Skywalker, but close enough.
    All Hail Lord Vader!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think their conclusions could very easily be refuted.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I had predicted Han Solo - nowhere near close!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The thing is: the star wars tech is very poorly thought through. Really, that many MW for slave 1's cannons? Do they even know how much energy that is? It just seems like a random high number. But cube equals d-star? Preposterous.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm not sure anymore. Both sides are awesome.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Where did they find the "facts" for this graphic. I'm a huge fan of both, and the specs seem to just be made up.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Now with the help of technology it is easy to make everything and the advantage is taken by the people. courseworkbox.co.uk

    ReplyDelete
  11. ST all the way. A few dozen Borg on an SD, game over Palpatine.

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for commenting!.